October 17, 2005

Good Night & Good Luck, where’s the woodchipper?

I have read mixed reviews re George Clooney’s film “Good Night and Good Luck,” which left me rather incurious about it. I’m not a “fan” (although I did love his film “Out of Sight” with Ving Rhames) and my impression upon reading so many reviews was that Clooney had made a good film that has nevertheless given short shrift to the reality of Communist infiltration into the government and elsewhere.

While it is a conceit of the left to call the investigations into such infiltration a “witch hunt,” and - while Joe McCarthy descended into sputtering incredibility on that issue - the recently uncovered Venona encrypts have made it clear that Alger Hiss was no innocent and that the basis of the investigation itself was sound.

Then my l’il brother Thom went to see the flick and emailed me his thoughts:

I found it both thrilling and depressing.

It’s thrilling, because it’s a first-rate piece of filmmaking, all moody black and white and jazz, with a standout perf by David Straithairn as Murrow. The use of Diana Reeves, as a black jazz singer working in a nearby CBS recording studio, is nothing short of inspired. She is the Greek chorus, a bold and clever move that really works.

But it’s also depressing, because the movie shows how far we have fallen. The movie is bracketed by Murrow’s famous 1958 speech to the RTNDA, in which he warned that television, unless used responsibly, will end up being nothing more than lights and wires in a box. And that is exactly what it has become. Once-celebrated news divisions are doing hour-long investigations into Paula Abdul and American Idol, and blowing up trucks for dramatic effect, and using fishy documents to make a meaningless and misguided case against the President. All of it in pursuit of profit.

People who are getting their skirts in a knot over the political shadings of the movie are missing the movie’s real point. It’s really about integrity, and credibility, and seriousness of thought. It’s about how the media explodes and distorts — and how television corrupts. The most consistent and insistent image in the movie is cigarette smoke — people are wreathed in haze, and constantly lighting and puffing. The only ad that is shown in its entirety in the movie is for Kent cigarettes. And yet cigarette smoking is what killed
Murrow, and eviscerated a generation who bought into its shallow satisfactions, peddled on the tube. These people will eventually be destroyed by the very thing that supported them and made them rich. It’s really a scathing indictment of the culture that created today’s television news business — and a bittersweet glance at what it once was, and promised to be, and isn’t anymore.

Clooney is on to something. His last movie — “Confessions of a Dangerous Mind” — was also about the media and its distortions. He grew up in this world, and is very much a product of it. Only someone who grew up in Hollywood, and who has been a modern equivalent of a matinee idol, and has been labeled the sexiest man alive, could understand the sham underneath the sheen. But he pulls the whole thing apart by looking at it through history. He doesn’t have to make any overt comments about what it all means. He has hindsight on his side.

Hmmmm…in our polarized nation, I can’t help but think that the fallout from this film - which sounds more interesting, given Thom’s take on it - will be that one side says “this is a wake up call for the press to stop serving up White House Swill (at least until Hillary gets in there!) and the other side will be saying, “this is a wake-up call for the press to stop reporting with Katrina-esque hysteria on every thing including the Bush White House’s damn advance work!”

Public Eye over at CBS has an interview with Clooney on the film wherein we get that word, “witchhunt” once again:

The film was not intended to change journalism, says Clooney, who suggests that too often some in today’s media “take a pass” on asking tough questions. “I think we’re evolving,” he said. “We used to burn witches at the stake, and then we had the Senate investigating people, and now we just have pundits being sort of unkind.

With all due respect, I think the media only “take a pass” on asking tough questions, or reporting uncomfortable stories when it suits them They simply seem to reserve the tough questions for some, and give the pass to others, or to stories which are nettlesome to their most sacred cows.

I am a fan of journalism and journalists. Or I was, and I would like to be, again. If the press wants to recover its diminished lustre, perhaps it needs to move beyond the “left good, right bad” philosophy which it has embraced. Because I have to tell you, after watching the way John Kerry almost made it to the White House without ever having to come clean about his military records (still not simply “made public” as he promised), and with the press actively working to protect him and discredit his critics, I tremble. I anticipate a 2008 campaign that consists of Terry Moran and David Gregory slobbering over the Hillary/Obama ticket and incapable of asking a question beyond “how’d you guys get to be so great…” while busily inserting any GOP candidate into a wood chipper.

And what makes me tremble about that…is not that “my” party won’t win. It’s that no one…NO ONE…should be carried into the Oval Office on the shoulders of a sycophantic press unwilling to ask an uncomfortable question, and all too quick to do that person’s bidding. That is how we move, very quickly, away from democracy, and toward something chillingly like tyranny.

And yes, I’d say the same thing if the press “loved” Bush. A skeptically raised eyebrow - one for the left and one for the right - and the temperate question are essentials to healthy journalism and a healthy democracy. But it seems to me the press has - particularly over the last two years - forgotten how to raise one of those brows.

by TheAnchoress @ 2:37 pm. Filed under The Fourth Estate
Trackback URL for this post:
http://theanchoressonline.com/2005/10/17/good-night-and-good-luck/trackback/

One Response to “Good Night & Good Luck, where’s the woodchipper?”

  1. Darrell Says:

    The VENONA(ANCHORESS) intercepts(released July 11, 1995) shred the “witchhunt notion” forever. Funny how Clooney chooses to ignore the facts. Not funny really, since Hollywood and the MSM created and perpetuate the idea that the charges had no substance and innocent lives were ruined. I have not seen the movie, but the trailers give the impression (the same old lie) that McCarthy was grilling Hollywood folks, not government employees–as he did. How come Hollywood “truth” is never about the truth?

Bad Behavior has blocked 18687 access attempts in the last 7 days.