|
|
March 3, 2006Talk amongst yourselves while I’m on retreat……a rather hastily arranged retreat, too. The last time I went on a hastily arranged retreat this is how it went. This time, it being Lent, I expect the other retreatants there will be a quieter bunch. But one never knows, do one? I have a lot of emails from people wondering why I have not linked to Michael Totten’s story about Saddam’s awful chambers - sorry, I have been busy and out all afternoon. It certainly deserves wide dissemination. A few things you may not have seen: Tony Snow’s piece on why it is wrong to kill the port deal with the UAE; he calls it the Essence of Surrender. Also, Jack Kelly’s essay suggesting that there is more Islamophobia involved than some want to admit. Jack also writes that the WH has weakened their own case because of their weak response to the cartoon wars. He links to this splendid essay by DJ Drummond on what some Arabs are saying about all of this. Then you read stories like this and read this: some are speculating it may have something to do with the publication of the Mohammed cartoons in the Daily Tar Heel, the newspaper of the University of North Carolina. And yeah…you pause and wonder at things. So let me post here my own thoughts - which I’ve meant to do all week, but you know I’m easily distracted: Is some of this - a lot of it, perhaps - about Islamophobia? Well, yeah. It seems a lot of people, particularly conservative people, are offended by the idea that their opposition to the UAE takeover of six of our ports might be rooted in “Islamophobia.” “It’s not Islamophobia! It’s prudence,” they say. Well, okay, but why can’t it be Islamophobia? After 9/11, I remember going into my local 7-11 for a cup of coffee. This store, like others, is owned by a Middle Eastern family. On 9/12/01 they conspicuously displayed a large American flag in the store, as if to say, “not us! We didn’t do it! We love America!” I remember asking them if anyone had been aggressive or accusatory toward them - which one might expect, given the great tragedy which had enveloped us. “No, no,” they responded. “Everyone has been concerned for us - that we are being treated alright. This is all terrible.” I remember feeling so proud of my country when I heard that - proud again when our President visited a mosque, and when I read stories of American women offering to shop with “women of cover” in order to shield them from any random unkindnesses directed their way by overwhelmed Americans who might lash out. I was proud to realize, in the passing weeks, that in a nation of almost 300 million people, only a handful of regrettable incidents occured in which Middle Eastern people were targeted for revenge. Americans are much more “tolerant” than many will admit, and we’re compassionate, too. I was not surprised to hear that others had inquired as to how the fellows at the 7-11 were being treated. That sort of respect, concern and sensitivity toward others was precisely what I have always expected from my compatriots. But perhaps America is growing weary of offering up respect, concern and sensitivity when their offerings seem not simply unrequited, but unappreciated as well. While the World Trade Center fell and the Pentagon burned, the West Bank danced. As America has risked her young men and women in efforts to save Muslims in Kosovo and Bosnia, to liberate them in Afghanistan and Iraq, she has had to watch a seemingly endless video loop of screaming Muslims packing the streets, blades exposed, carrying signs denouncing, America, the Great Satan. It seems like the same mobs have gathered to denounce Jimmy Carter, then Ronald Reagan, then George H. W. Bush, then Bill Clinton, then George W. Bush. Despite all of our “tolerance,” America has seen her flags trampled; despite all the split blood of her young, she have seen her presidents burned in effigy. Despite all of her service to liberty, she has seen scimitars raised at her, in gleeful abandon. It is undoubtedly true that in a world of 1.2 billion Muslims, the ones who get the camera time and the headlines are the Islamofascist extremists, that the great majority of Muslims are not wild-eyed, ululating deatheaters, but ordinary people who just want to get on with the business of living and raising families. I believe that, and I think most Americans believe it, too. The problem is, we don’t get to see those Muslims. We don’t know where they are! I see two guys at the 7-11, and they certainly seem like decent enough chaps, but in truth over the past four years they’ve become quieter and twitchier and less forthcoming, and we with our cups of Hawaiian Kona Blend have stopped inquiring as to their well-being. We’ve become quieter and twitchier, too. Everyone is wary and watchful on both sides of the counter, and distrust seems easier, lately. Am I Islamophobic? I hate to think I might be. I try my best to love everyone, as my Lord has said I must. But a phobia is not - contrary to what the politically correct would tell you - a “hate.” Phobia is fear Am I afraid of Islam? Well, yeah, I may very well be. It is not “hate” but plain common sense that tells me to feel threatened when I know that at any given moment, somewhere in the world, 100,000 men, women and children are gathering and holding signs urging the beheading of anyone who does not show sufficient “respect” to their prophet. I’m a very respectful person but I feel threatened when “respect” seems to mean nothing less than submission and obsequious kowtowing, which I am not willing to offer. I tend to think the UAE managing a few of our ports is not a bad idea. The enlightened American in me understands that the UAE is an ally, that it has been helpful to our troops and to our government in the war on terror. I know that President Clinton thinks very highly of the UAE, as does President Bush and our Secretary of State, and I assume they know a little bit more about the UAE than I do. I do not for a moment believe that President Bush has suddenly abandoned his promise to defend the nation. I also think that allowing an ally to invest financially in our country gives them a stake - an interest - in seeing that America is not economically crippled by terrorist attacks. I support the deal. I can understand why others don’t, though. And I accept that they may have valid concerns that are seperate and apart from mere “Islamophobia.” But I have difficulty believing their vehement denials that “phobia” could play even a minor role in their position, because I understand just how afraid and skittish I am feeling about these countries, and the members of their faith who seem like they’d as soon kill me as look at me. And I support the deal. I am an American, though, and I will not surrender to that fear any more than I will “surrender” to that faith. I am an American, and I will believe in my God, and laugh when I will, and love where I will, and say what I wish - and I will defend everyone else’s right to do the same, as long as they don’t believe their rights include making me shut up. Because I am an American, I want to see my country create successful working partnerships with Arab and Islamic nations; such a move seems the next logical step in the war on terror. And dammit, I do not want to be held hostage to my fear. I do not want to fear. We need to start seeing some “moderate” Muslims come out and speak up in defense of the America that has been doing its damndest, particularly in the last few years, to help formerly tyrannized Islamic people find their liberty, to bring Islamic countries into the marketplace of ideas and inclusionary economics, without forcing our culture or morals upon them. If we could see these sorts of Muslims, if some of them would come out of hiding and speak up, that would make the UAE deal much easier to support. But I support it, anyway, because I am an American, and to block a deal that makes a lot of sense to me, simply to ease my fears, seems wrong to me - wrong and ugly. It’s someone I don’t want to be. It’s a country I don’t want America to be. To trust and to encourage and to take a chance - those are scary propositions in these times. But they are quinessentially American in character. Americans are a courageous people, and courage is about acknowledging danger but carefully - carefully - going forward. I’d post more but I have to make supper and get going. Here are some more really interesting stories and posts: Gateway Pundit on how some animal-rights folks don’t mind going after kids delicate psyches, if that’s what it takes Julie’s checked out the Arinze podcasts and pronouced them “great.” Gerald is focusing on a priest who is a whirling dervish or something. Check out the video. http://theanchoressonline.com/2006/03/03/talk-amongst-yourselves-while-im-on-retreat/trackback/ 7 Responses to “Talk amongst yourselves while I’m on retreat…” |
March 3rd, 2006 at 7:01 pm
I strongly suspect that Islamophobia is a word in the process of being beaten out of shape until it is unrecognizable.
But what I have taken it to mean since I first saw the word in the British press, is the belief that there is something inherent in the religion of Islam itself which makes its believers automaticly violent and absolutely incapable of participating responsibly in an open and multi-religious society.
In other words, the problem with Muslims is that they are Muslim.
I have never seen you say any such thing Anchoress, and I do not think you are Islamophobic, nor do I think it of people who oppose the Dubai deal.
There are some folks we both know whom I do think are Islamophobic. These people have asserted that the problem with Muslims is that they are Muslim. However, I’ll be polite and not mention their names.
We need to start seeing some “moderate” Muslims come out and speak up in defense of the America that has been doing its damndest, particularly in the last few years, to help formerly tyrannized Islamic people find their liberty
Well, maybe when you get back from your retreat you could do some reading here:
/
http://www.aifdemocracy.org/
/
http://www.islam-democracy.org/terrorism_statement.asp
/
http://www.freemuslims.org/document.php?id=74
/
http://www.aicongress.org/sop.html
/
http://www.thestar.com/NASApp/cs/ContentServer?pagename=thestar/Layout/Article_Type1&c=Article&cid=1141037292287&cal
/
Have a good retreat!
March 3rd, 2006 at 9:47 pm
Have a good retreat, Anchoress. I hope that the port deal goes through because I think that to give into fear/prejudice generated by Islamofascists embarasses the angels whom God has sent to keep us from dashing our foot against a stone. If God cares if I stub my toe, then certainly He cares to protect me from my larger fears. Of course, there’s a certain segment of the Democratic party that you could get to go for the DPW deal just by telling them that the only American company with the know-how to take over running our ports immediately, as they claim should happen at all of them, is Halliburton.
March 3rd, 2006 at 11:45 pm
SUV Plows Through Crowd at UNC; Six Hurt
Authorities planned to charge a former University of North Carolina student with attempted murder af
March 4th, 2006 at 3:40 pm
[...] FOLLOW-UP: To those who use the race card in debating with those of us who oppose the “ports deal” with DPW, calling us paranoids, Islamophobes, and nativists, among other ad hominem-style terms of endearment (just count the number Tony Snow utilized in his column), I encourage you to read the thoughtful posts by John Hawkins and The Anchoress on the subject. While both are not against “the deal,” as I am, they bring a sober, objective perspective to the issues being sighted by many proponents. Do take the time to read them. [...]
March 4th, 2006 at 10:18 pm
Have a good retreat. I don’t think you’re an “Islamophobist” and I should know.
March 9th, 2006 at 12:05 pm
[...] I read all the arguments the administration floated in favor of the deal. I understand the political considerations involved for us not to be considered as Islamophobic. Still, every time I think about an Arabic country having any type of control over our ports, even if it’s only pushing paper, it makes my skin crawl. [...]
September 28th, 2006 at 11:22 pm
[...] It is good to dialogue with folks like Ali, a moderate Muslim, but not enough such moderates are speaking out, and folks on the left, always desiring to seem “more tolerant” than ordinary human beings, and thus “more noble” has been busily making friends with the very people they used to despise for veiling women and persecuting gays. While they do that, they muddy up just what a “moderate” is. Ali is surely a moderate and even some who hated all Muslims have come around to seeing that (or to hearing it). But I cannot say it is beyond my comprehension why - for many - all Muslims are considered suspect. [...]