|
September 6, 2006Clintonistas clueless, here - UPDATEDUPDATE::: SCROLL DOWN FOR ORIGINAL POST::: Read the whole article. Clearly, unless a thing makes him look like the hero and savior of the world, Bill Clinton doesn’t want it out there for public consumption. Blue Crab Boulevard astutely notes: Now…the left side of the blogosphere and mainstream Democratic politicians are calling for [The Path to 9/11] to be radically changed or silenced. Some are gloating that they think they have silenced some voices.[...] One group decries the accuracy, the other decries the existence. Who is in favor of silencing the opposition again? Who is in favor of curtailing the free speech of others? All of this, of course, is meant to politicize, polarize and discredit the film. If the Clintonistas can’t get it pulled, they’ll make sure the whole endeavor is characterized as a “right wing glorification of Bush,” even though - from what I have read, anyway - Bush’s mistakes get shown, too. I don’t know about anyone else, but I am so tired of this “scorched earth” technique of overwhelming any issue with a PR bombardment and loud subject changing. I’m so tired of the Clintonian methods and models. Do the Clintonistas not understand just how very bad they look as they hysterically try to discredit this film?. Do those members of the press jumping on the Clinton bandwagon realize what protective toadies and hypocrites they look like? They’d do much better to simply let the thing play and act like grown ups…but as I wrote here, they’re not used to not having full control over a media issue…or history. The American Thinker has more and Dean Barnett muses on the program. http://theanchoressonline.com/2006/09/06/clintonistas-clueless-here/trackback/ 7 Responses to “Clintonistas clueless, here - UPDATED” |
September 6th, 2006 at 5:55 pm
From the article: “A statement from Samuel “Sandy” Berger, who was national security adviser to President Bill Clinton at the time, calls the scenes involving him “complete fabrications.”
Yeah, CONVICTED FELON Sandy “PANTS” Berger is really convincing when it comes to telling the truth.
September 6th, 2006 at 8:36 pm
My feeling is that the Hillary bust has demoralized the whole crew to the point that they now are self-destructing in public.
September 6th, 2006 at 9:15 pm
Lack of 9/11 Movie Edits Cut into Dems Plans
And the Clinton Camp is not happy.
September 7th, 2006 at 7:22 am
I wonder how those defnding Clinton, et al, would react to if another president, past or present, demanded that a docudrama be changed?
As for members of the press, why should they care abour looking like hypocrites now?
They don’t care enough to tell the truth about the war on terror and other realities.
Why on earth would they tell the truth about Bill Clinton??
September 7th, 2006 at 9:57 am
[...] Hat tip for some of these links: The Anchoress [...]
September 7th, 2006 at 12:06 pm
[...] So where did they think we were keeping them? In the Heidelberg Castle? The dungeon at Neuschwanstein? In Pinch Sulzberger’s private bathroom? Sandy Berger’s socks? [...]
September 7th, 2006 at 8:56 pm
[...] Will ABC Broadcast “The Path to 9/11″ or Will it Succumb to Democratic Pressure? Media Matters for America: The Moderate Voice: Redstate Network / Redstate: Scared Monkeys: AJStrata / The Strata-Sphere: Rob Port / Say Anything: Kobayashi Maru: Don Surber: Taylor Marsh: The Anchoress: Jon / GOP Bloggers: DEMOCRATS FOR CENSORSHIP Memeorandum [...]