Blue Crab Boulevard noticed it:
Want proof that the New York Times made a major mistake with its “November surprise?” revelation about Iraq’s nuclear program?
The wire services are ignoring it. Nothing at all on the Yahoo News page. Nothing. No coverage.
There may be something out there but it is being ignored on the aggregaters.
[...]
The wire services are not spreading this. Okay, found something on CNET, still no big wire service stories. If anyone sees one, put a link in the comments.
Hmmm…as of this writing, there are no sitings in his comments section. I notice Drudge, is not covering the backfire, either.
Stephen Spruiell also noticed.
Writes Grandaddy Long Legs: The death of the “Bush Lied!” meme is a huge story, but it’s not one that the collective media is going to willingly cover. So use this Google link to type in the name of your local news service, and get started.
Doubt making noise will change much. When the press doesn’t want to tell you a story, it doesn’t tell you a story. That’s what blogs are for.
November 3rd, 2006 at 7:09 pm
Saddam had nuclear ambitions…..yawn
Saddam had WMD as Bush said….yawn
New York Times verifies the facts….yawn
not story move along…
New York Times story is covered up..yawn
Bush lied..1 million died…boy howdy…..Stop the presses..that is THE story!!!!!
November 4th, 2006 at 9:32 am
The documents the Times authenticated: Illustrated
Ever wondered what was in the cache of captured Iraqi documents (besides the plans that indicate Saddam was months away from having an atomic device)?
November 4th, 2006 at 10:49 am
Kelleyb says it well…
Isn’t it sad?
The deceit continues, and we all know, if this were a Democrat President, the stories would be the exact opposite.
We must send another message this Tuesday if we can, the Liberal Democrat Bias does not dictate our Existence.
Vote!