|
May 5, 2007Unserious vs Serious, scanning the sphereDoug Ross has posted what is perhaps his best post and says what I have tried to say for a couple of years now, but he does it concisely and with simple lucidity: Let’s play a game. I call it Frivolous vs. Magnanimous. It’s a great way to highlight the differences between the two political parties. Magnanimous: The Republican debate appeared on noted pro-Democratic outlet MSNBC and was hosted by liberal pundit Chris Matthews… with color commentary offered by Keith Olbermann. Olbermann, of course, is an unhinged leftist who recently named the GOP the “leading terrorist group” in America. The Republicans were unafraid of political spin and were happy to appear on MSNBC. Magnanimous: I can find no serious effort by Republican leaders to suppress free speech. To the contrary, I’ve found only examples of Republicans defending the right to dissent. In between those two topics, Ross also compares the Democrat and Republican responses to: Supreme Court Justices (Don’t miss that one), War, Voting and Vandalism and Fair Voting Practices. His post is one you’ll want to go read, and save. And think about it. He did miss one thing, though, the idea that the Dems now want to stop spying on terrorists so they can “prove” the man-made global warming theory. Which is nice, I guess in one respect - it is a tacit acknowledgment that - DiFi aside - the science is not “settled.” Ed Driscoll suspects things are only going to get worse and more nuts. Some other thought-provoking reads worth your time: Dick Meyer wrote about the ascendancy of political paranoia a while ago. Now, Ed Morrissey take a look at how it seems to be running rampant on the left, where “reality” seems to be taking a holiday, as even the distinctions between pretending for a camera and actually being the person you are are becoming blurry to them. Ed makes a great point at the end of that piece. Also, don’t miss his thoughts on what hate crimes legislation will bring us. Adult Stem Cell Therapy making inroads in treating ailing hearts. Let’s see…people euthanasia, embryonic stem cell research and aborting of babies is good, but dog euthanasia is reprehensible. Damn me if I can find any consistency in it. And, I’m sorry, but this is - to may way of thinking - unambiguously wrong. Something kind of fun: Anne & Anne chatting on bloggingheads. I liked it. Ever read about how a film is considered “great” and wondered if there was something wrong with you for thinking it way overrated? Here is a list of 100 overrated/underrated films that I find myself much in agreement with, particularly re the foreign films. Have fun. Wha?? Saudi women stripping for the internet? Varifrank on the debates. I know it’s a day old, but it’s Varifrank. I like this long, thoughtful and very charmingly fond piece by Cobb, writing about his friends, “The Regulars.” Sometimes we forget how great it is to have friends we see regularly, know well and enjoy being around - a great gift, something for which to be thankful in an increasingly splintered and lonely world. Finally, speaking of friends, Tracey knows the most interesting characters! http://theanchoressonline.com/2007/05/05/unserious-vs-serious-scanning-the-sphere/trackback/ 3 Responses to “Unserious vs Serious, scanning the sphere” |
May 5th, 2007 at 8:34 am
Thank you for the kind words! I had missed the latest Democratic global warming follies and have updated my post accordingly.
I also included the topic of media criticism as well (the David Broder incident struck me as, well, frivolous).
Hat tips to the Anchoress and Larwyn for the suggestions!
May 5th, 2007 at 9:43 am
I dunno Anchoress! “The Truth About Cats and Dogs” as best chick flick? YAWN! He lost me there. Though I am always grateful for the inclusion of The Big Lebowski.
May 5th, 2007 at 11:40 am
Completely off topic, but you’re not likely to ever hear anything like this in your lifetime. Just thought I’d share.