|
May 16, 2007Debates, Falwell, Hoohah, etcTHE DEBATE: But J’s been watching, as have Dean Barnett and Don Surber. Captain Ed gives it to Rudy, others do some others. Michelle Malkin liveblogged it and has links up the wazoo, as does Instapundit. Hot Air compares the FOX Hume-hosted debate to the MSNBC Matthews-hosted debate. Media Blog goes one better and puts together video montage of the two debates. Don’t miss it. The difference in substance is really staggering. The FOX crew did not throw softballs, and they made plenty of candidates squirm. Word is CBS will host the final DNC-sanctioned debate, with Couric in charge. I wonder if she’ll ask them why they were afraid to debate before Hume at FOX. I wonder if she’ll ask them what they think makes Hillary so great? I wonder if she’ll ask them about the debate over the “gi-normous” windfarms off the coast of Nantucket and how they upset Walter Cronkite? Speaking of Debates, watch Hillary debate herself on funding Iraq. Come on, woman, be consistent. Don’t let Obama scare you away from your initial convictions. When things turn around in Iraq - as they seem to be doing, certainly, in Anbar, you’ll look like a prescient leader. Unless you keep flip-flopping! Ed Koch says the surrendering Democrats will be responsible for the blood that will follow - both here in the US and abroad - our pulling out before stability is achieved: Because the Democrats are forcing an end to the struggle in Iraq, we must now prepare to fight terrorism in our homeland for the next thirty or more years. This is a war of civilizations. The Islamic terrorists worldwide want to destroy the U.S. and every other Western nation, along with moderate Muslim nations, e.g., Egypt, Jordan, etc. Our very survival as a nation is involved. Will we have the courage and will to do all that will be necessary to prevail? He’s quite right, although it won’t be spun that way. Instead of just hanging in and defeating the whole concept of terrorism as a means of movement - even though that is hard and takes a long-term view of things, in the Middle East - we’ll instead have John Kerry’s “terrorism as a daily inconvenience” here at home…for the next few decades. What a great plan. Not that anyone cares, really, but more evidence that Saddam hearted Al Qaeda. FALWELL: Kathryn Jean Lopez has a little blurb about reporter’s reactions to Falwell’s death. Not edifying; rather adolescent. “It is a good day!” About what you’d expect. J notes that the daughter of Martin Luther King, Jr has passed. My birth mother always said “these things come in threes,” and then would launch into a rather jolly speculation about who would be “next.” I’m thinking Tammy Faye Bakker. But my pal Dee says that Jane Wyman is always the stand-by “third” person who “could be next.” But then, she spend an inordinate amount of time at the Old Blue Eyes Memorial Celebrity Death Watch. HOOHAH: RANDOM STUFF: Christopher Hitchens is saying that Paul Wolfowitz is being slimed and has done nothing wrong at the World Bank. Former UN Ambassador Andrew Young agrees with Hitchens and calls the movement against Wolfy “crap.” Clarice Feldman is calling the whole affair an attempted Putsch Nevertheless, ABC is saying Wolfowitz may resign this afternoon (H/T Pajamas Media: The officials say the bank’s board will accept Wolfowitz’s resignation but will also acknowledge that the World Bank’s Ethics Committee bears “some responsibility” for giving him bad advice on the issue of his girlfriend. In other words, “yeah, we admit the whole “scandal” was crap from start to finish, but we wanted and got the scalp.” Seems shabby to me. Among other things. :::Update::: Word is Wolfowitz is not resigning. Jules Crittenden says it’s time for a little chat in a tone that sounds suspiciously like “say hello to my little friend… Fausta shows how Western feminists have become clowns. French journalists soon will be clowns if they agree to not report on violence. GM Roper is preparing for Memorial Day with a thought-provoking post. Glenn Reynolds wonders if, by Imperialism, the left means this. Dan Rather is taking up acting. Why not? Actors think they’re journalists, journalists think they’re in showbidness…it’s all screwed up. Siggy is writing about Science and Faith. He and the Sanity Squad have posted a podcast on the subject with guest Rabbi Shmuley Boteach. He’s also writing about Love and Friendship in a way that suggests he has lots more to say about it, so stay tuned. http://theanchoressonline.com/2007/05/16/scanning-the-sphere-debates-falwell-hoohah-etc/trackback/ 7 Responses to “Debates, Falwell, Hoohah, etc” |
May 16th, 2007 at 1:01 pm
Without talking of Jerry Falwell’s politics I must say years ago I watched his church services on TV and I was impressed with what he preached.
.
Simply put, he preached the Word of God, and believed, as I do, that if God said it a million years ago, He still means it.
.
For those wackos on the left who are saying he’s in hell…well I think they’re in for a big surprise. His work on earth was finished and God called him home and in a quick way.
.
Though his family is undoubtedly in the pain of grief right now they surely must be jubilant knowing he entered into the Kingdom of Heaven yesterday.
May 16th, 2007 at 2:33 pm
Rev. Falwell was a controversial and highly divisive figure. I seldom agreed with him about anything. However much I might have decried many of the things he said, I never doubted his sincerity. He tried to make a contribution and he loved this country. I hope the same will be said of me when it’s my turn to go.
About the rest, it’s not for us to judge his life and/or his intentions. Reverend Falwell is now in the hands of Another, Greater Judge.
May 16th, 2007 at 2:38 pm
By the way - Anchoress - thank you for once again causing me to behave like the kinder human I aspire to be, rather than the snarky wench I all to often actually am!
All that being said, I am really looking forward to a couple of things:
1) Fred Thompson’s debate with Michael Moore - because then Michael Moore will cease to be a festering pimple on the butt of our public discourse.
2) The Thompson/Giuliani 2008 ticket - which will say what needs to be said in clear, unequivocal terms. We need less parsing, less “sensitivity”, less political correctness, less “nuance” - less nonsense in order for our national conversation to continue productively.
May 16th, 2007 at 3:59 pm
oh my goodness…
Hillary Rodham Clinton is talking in circles.
Does she really take the American Public as being this foolish?
More Lies in one week, than her husband could offer in two, and that’s a ton of deceit.
Did you notice the Yanks continue to struggle?
Maybe there is more to the Clinton Curse than just jest.
What is truly stunning, Hillary will say every once in awhile, after the lengthy ‘out of Iraq now’ diatribe, that she would leave some US Forces in Iraq, because al Qaeda is there and it is in Our National Interest.
LOL !
You simply cannot make this kind of dishonesty up.
Spinning in such an bizarre manner, making the Kerry flip flop of old, look somewhat normal.
May 16th, 2007 at 3:59 pm
PS: in regards to the GOP debate, Romney and Rudy remain impressive…
May 16th, 2007 at 5:36 pm
[...] 4: The Anchoress skipped the debate. I trust she will look at teh Rudy You Tube [...]
May 16th, 2007 at 11:34 pm
RE: the reporters who reacted with glee at Falwell’s death.
‘
Who died and made them gods?