|
September 20, 2007Scanning the ’sphereGlenn Reynolds has a wonderful economy of words and he rarely sounds less than curious and ebullient (and we love that in him) but twice today he’s sounded just a wee bit tired of the double-standards that come from politicians, academic institutions, etc., and I rather like reading him this way, too! Here he is on Congress:
Yeah…Congress is funny that way. And about the academy, he posts Michael Barone’s excellent point that Columbia will not welcome ROTC to the campus because they’re being sensitive to gays…but they don’t mind welcoming a man who hangs gays for, well, being gay. Michael Barone emails:
To which Glenn replies with a touch of sage and snark:
He’s quite right, of course. All I know is, I read about Ahmadinejad coming to NYC (and wishing to lay a wreath at 9/11) and thought, “once upon a time Rudy Giuliani would not allow Yasir Arafat into Lincoln Center. I think he’d enormously enjoy saying “no”…and a whole lot more, to Ahmadinejad.” This lady sums it up well. She misses the tough Mayor. More info on Norman Hsu here and here and here, and other shady or questionable Clinton fund-raiser “bundlers” here and here. Doesn’t the press seem very incurious about this whole story? AND about Sandy Berger being back on Hillary’s team? As little coverage as possible. The press obligingly changes the headlines to blare a very lame joke by Hillary (some fun with that here), and the even more pathetic (and potentially back-firing) bite one of her lapdogs tried to take out of Rudy. Yeah, that’s smart - after you’ve spent the last 15 years saying, “our personal life is our personal life; there should be a zone of privacy” and (quite reasonably) “hands off Chelsea”, you get one of your minions to go after Rudy’s personal life, marriage and relationship with his kids. THAT’S going to scare those social conservatives away! And no one will notice the hypocrisy! (Well, okay, most of the press wont…) And the press isn’t making much of the fact that Mrs. Clinton - who many on both the right and the left said missed a real moment last week - voted against the Congressional condemnation of the Moveon.org ad smearing Gen. David Petraeus. Captain Ed notes:
Uh-huh. She wants the moveon money…but she somehow wants the public and the military to believe that she’ll be a trustworthy and honorable Commander-in-Chief. Egad. She’s not really inspiring. She’s not really impressive. And yet she is the “it” girl for the press and they’ll do anything for her. I just don’t get it. Is it because they love Bill so much? I GOT his appeal. I do not get hers. Meanwhile, even Wesley Clark says Moveon made a mistake with that ad and he says Petraeus told the truth. Podcasts you might want to listen to: Siggy, Fausta and Dymphna apparently go into a slugfest. Meanwhile if you have not checked out Julie (Happy Catholic) Davis’s “Forgotten Classics”, you’re missing a treat. I can’t listen on the computer because before he left Buster did not set me up on itunes and his brother took the speakers on the other computer - but I’ve heard her by other means, and she is wonderful reading these great old books - a very lively character actress - although I don’t know where she finds the time! She is in the latter stages of Georgette Heyer’s The Black Moth, (which I will now have to re-read) and I have it on excellent authority that she will soon be starting Rumer Godden’s China Court! That should be a great one. My dream: She and I do a tag-team on a Jeeves and Wooster novel, with Julie doing all the big parts and me showing up for the little ones! I’ve always, always wanted to give voice to Aunt Dahlia and Anatole, the temperamental French Chef. And Madeline (”I call her a ghastly girl because she is a ghastly girl!”) Bassett - I’ve always wanted to do that soupy, droopy baby voice! Perhaps someday! Oh death, where is thy victory?. A moving story. http://theanchoressonline.com/2007/09/20/scanning-the-sphere-2/trackback/ 7 Responses to “Scanning the ’sphere” |
Bad Behavior has blocked 25441 access attempts in the last 7 days.
September 21st, 2007 at 12:48 am
wow, you really covered the net.
it really saddens, to think the unethical Clintons, who negligently did nothing for 8 years to address the growing threat of Radical Muslim Militancy, are trying to get back to the Presidency again.
it amazes to consider so many Democrats are eager to return Bill and Hillary to such power and responsibility again.
just seems this Nation deserves better…
September 21st, 2007 at 7:30 am
If he goes to Columbia I would like to see a large contingent of NYC firefighters grimly present as a rebuke to him, to Columbia and to the world.
Never forget.
September 21st, 2007 at 9:18 am
” Is it because they love Bill so much? I GOT his appeal. I do not get hers.”
Also because they’re afraid of her, I suspect.
Word on the Street is that Hillary has made it clear to everyone … campaign contributers , press and the like … that there will be severe punishment for anyone who doesn’t play along. The line goes, She *will be* the next president, and anyone who doesn’t give her 100% is going to be shut out from any kind of useful access for the duration of her eight year term. For a news agency, that’s a fate worse than death.
Accordingly, everyone (with the exception of the LA Times) has been very careful not to say anything that might incur her wrath.
The upside of that is, if she ever does look vulnerable and fall from her pedestal, they’ll turn on her and savage her like wolves. The problem with ruling by fear is that once the fear is gone, it gives way to vicious, vicious anger.
That’s my understanding, anyway.
Respectfully,
Brian P.
September 21st, 2007 at 9:19 am
Against the standards of our current level of discourse (which, like you, I could wish were higher), the moveon.ad seems like pretty small beans. I do note that Admiral William Fallon, Chief of CENTCOM and Petraeus’ nominal superior, is reported to have called called him a “[redacted]-kissing little chicken[redacted]“ (I do my small part here for elevated discourse), so I presume that, having survived such a judgment delivered to his face, our general might be disposed to take a mere political ad in stride–sticks & stones, and all that.
cordially,
September 21st, 2007 at 10:03 am
Anchoress, I was so moved by Dr. Pauche’s story and some of the meaningful things he had to say. Thank you for posting this today.
September 21st, 2007 at 5:16 pm
Rand, well, if that guy says it then we should CERTAINLY discount anything Petreaus says! Just like, since Bob Kerrey described Bill Clinton as an “exceptionally good liar, exceptionally good,” we should just disbelieve everything Bill Clinton says, all the time.
You can always find someone to say something rotten about someone else.
Wesley Clarke, on the other hand, says something different. I’m not of a mind to get into a pissing contest with you about it. I’m also not going to go round and round pointing out all the ways the left goes hysterical at much less provocation, or spend time encouraging to do vice versa. I just don’t have the time or the energy for it right now. Too much going on personally.
September 21st, 2007 at 5:50 pm
Are we really surprised by this whole MoveOn business, especially where Hillary is concerned? When Bill Clinton was elected, the documented fact that he was a draft-dodger was made known by his detractors. Both were hippies in their college days. And, as older readers will well remember, 90% of hippies in those days were also Communist sympathizers, if not card-carrying Communists themselves.
/
Add to this the fact that Hillary has, in addition to the “severe punishment” you mention for those not toeing her line, also announced an intention to start something she blatantly calls an Academy of Indoctrination for all Civil Service workers, according to a story I read at MSNBC news a few days ago. The media may be afraid of being denied access for news stories; I’m positively TERRIFIED at what she will do to this country.
/
Remember, this is the wife of the President who gave our arch-enemy Red China “most favored nation” status and thus flooded our marketplaces with cheap Chinese junk (pun intended), leaving us trapped in a situation in which the Chinese government engaged in some very serious sword-rattling when President Bush, at the beginning of his first term, threatened to revoke that status if the Chinese did not stop stifling competition with their extremely low prices.
/
*Sigh* It’s individuals like this that can sometimes make me regret that, as a veteran, it’s my sworn duty to protect all Presidents, past and present. Not that I would deliberately shirk that duty if the need ever occurred in my presence, which is *EXTREMELY* unlikely in my current state in life.