|
March 7, 2008Pelosi & Clinton Money, Morrissey & moreInteresting stuff around the ’sphere, just for youse: Department of Appreciation: My blogfather Ed Morrissey left behind his Captains Quarter’s Blog, but he’s hit the ground running over at Hot Air, as evidenced here, here, here and here. That last bit is a really excellent analysis of how Hillary Clinton wants to run on her White House “experience” without coming clean about a moment of her time there.
This is a curiously inaccurate headline - (oops, they changed the headline; this morning it read: Archivists block release of Clinton papers) - the Clinton papers are not being blocked by “archivists,” but by Bill Clinton, himself:
Of course, if the Democrats will only let Hillary be the nominee, she’ll finally show her tax-returns, too - maybe, although things might get sticky - and if only we will put her back into the White House, she might let us see those papers. Probably. If she doesn’t invoke some sort of Executive privilege. Ugh. I’m so tired of Clintonian two-stepping. Dept. of More Two-Stepping: Remember when the Clintons tried to stop ABC from airing The Path to 9/11? There will be no release of a DVD. Dept. of cloying double standards: President and Mrs. Clinton are not the only ones being coy about money and influence, Nancy Pelosi is, too:
Think this would be such a non-issue if she had a different letter after her name? I know some wags are looking for Al Gore to do something at the Democrat convention but I doubt it: he’s getting too rich off his private citizenship and has too many laurels being thrown. Now worth in excess of 100 million dollars, much of it made from the ManMade Global Warming Industry, there might be conflicts of interest, there…or something. I was a Democrat back when I thought Gore was a strong addition to the Clinton ticket, but his campaign in 2000 turned me off and I still can’t shake the sense that the boy’s not right. Dept of Have-some-inspiration: A Chaplain’s Chaplain (H/T Reader Donna). Dept. of Medicine: Has a Harvard economist found
Somehow I don’t think Hillary will like it; too much personal control. I might like it, though. Dept. of Tricky Video: Kate the Great plays with Obama’s stuff. Dept. of Dance: Lorie Byrd explains why George W Bush is doing the old-soft-shoe.
I agree with Lorie that he’ll be happy to shuffle off stage. Unlike Clinton, who never fully left the stage, Bush will likely disappear for a while and when he comes back on the scene (if he does) it will be as a humanitarian animal, not a political one. On the blogs: Bookworm looks at Chicago Politics and Obama Neoneocon looks at The Audacity of Michelle Obama Deacon Greg gets nostalgic about growing up Catholic. We boomers can never get enough looking backward, can we? Brits at their Best look at An MEP Corruption report that seems not to be getting much coverage Meanwhile, Tony Blair is heading to Yale and talking about faith and globalism. Brian at Inside Catholic Betsy Newmark looks at what anti-Americanism isn’t. http://theanchoressonline.com/2008/03/07/pelosi-clinton-money-morrissey-more/trackback/ One Response to “Pelosi & Clinton Money, Morrissey & more” |
Bad Behavior has blocked 16896 access attempts in the last 7 days.
March 8th, 2008 at 12:54 pm
The mighty CAPTAIN is top notch, and Hot Air is lucky to have him…
The Clintons are simply the most unethical we have experienced on our National Stage in modern memory.
A real American tragedy, which seems to never end.
How could Democrats continue to enable this self serving folly, or even some Conservatives entertain playing with FIRE in weak attempts of political sabotage?
Then again, sadly, Mr. McCain is busy offering bitter, temperamental responses to the same Liberal Partisans who endorsed him for the Presidency, embarrassed about his considering running with John ‘Swift’ Kerry.
Instead of handling it with grace and humor, turning the evidence he was desired as a running mate into a positive, McCain knows it only reminds the Conservatives he has more in common with Democrat Senate Elites, without sincere accomplishment and a very Liberal lean.
So the Senator lies about it, denies it, won’t talk about it, using poor judgement, making it an issue when it really isn’t, much like Hillary and Bill’s hiding records (except they may have something to hide).
One would think McCain would be thrilled he has the Nomination, thankful the NY Times endorsed him, and smiles at the reminder of his being sought after by a close friend for VP.
But nope…
The only thing more unattractive about his bitter nature on a plane, talking to the expected ’silly’ nature of a NY Times Partisan, is John McCain’s health and age.
I watched him with President GW Bush, and was really disappointed again. I tried to have a real open mind, yet John McCain looked like the current CIC’s angry GrandFather.
John McCain kept the President waiting (?), late to his own big endorsement, and appeared so terribly old, unhealthy, inarticulate, unpleasant, and unimpressive.
In fact, he even failed to have the class, to simply say he would be PROUD to have the President’s support, when asked if the Senator would use President Bush Jr. in the upcoming Campaign.
Instead, McCain muttered something about busy schedules, and a fundraising.
It was embarrassing.
For many reasons, John McCain tends to remind me of the tired politics of the Clintons. Instinct keeps suggesting, this is no ’straight talk’, and I really believe ALL of the Senators running for the Presidency will be a sincere problem.
“I remain very upset that what they did caused such damage,” said Black, now a professor at the University of Missouri at Kansas City, recalling how Lincoln’s bankruptcy cost the government $3 billion. Moreover, he said he believes McCain intervened partly because his wife had invested money with Lincoln chairman Charles Keating, a campaign contributor who let the McCains use his home in the Bahamas.
The story of how the “Keating Five” senators allegedly pressured regulators to lay off a failing Arizona S&L became a major scandal, and marked a turning point in McCain’s life - the near-death of his political career followed by his eventual rebirth as a crusader for campaign finance reform.
The events of 1987, when McCain met with regulators, and 1991, when the Senate Ethics Committee concluded that he used “poor judgment” in the matter, are only dimly remembered by many.’
[Edited to admit link - admin]