|
April 30, 2008The Sheehaning of Jeremiah Wright?Here is an interesting thought, but I must confess it comes not from me, but from a reader, Diane S, who reminded me of this piece (which I am reposting here) and wondered whether Jeremiah Wright, “in the thick of a white-hot media spotlight” is falling prey to the same destructive disease of ego expansion that has struck and deranged others. I think perhaps Wright is not under the same spell. I have no doubt that he is enjoying the attention and his new-found prominence, but I don’t think he is finding “love” and “validation” in the media glare, as seemed to be the case with Cindy Sheehan, Gore, and maybe post 2000-primaries John McCain. They had each been lionized by media because they were convenient tools; they created necessary “distance” for the press, who supported their views but needed to maintain an “unbiased” illusion - Sheehan on the war, Gore on anything anti-Bush and McCain against conservatism. Each of them were treated to huge, almost absurd slatherings of vastly positive media goo, and I think it is the goo that can eventually muck anyone up. Wright is getting a lot of attention, but it is not uniformly positive, and he is not being used as a weapon against anyone - at least not by the press. Rather, the man keeps running his open sore of a mouth and the press keeps saying, “home run!” while trying to downplay what the rest of us see and hear with our lying eyes and ears. Perhaps Wright has spent a lifetime wondering why Jesse Jackson and Al Sharpton got all the glory while he had the more rousing rhetoric. In that case, he might feel only that he is finally getting what he is due. That’s “validation” of a sort, but it hasn’t the same savor as love - which, perhaps, Wright crave so deeply. Or, considering revealing tidbit, maybe he craves it in ways we simply cannot comprehend. Meanwhile, here is the repost - note I seem to have lost some of my earlier snark as the blog has evolved; or maybe I really was just in a bad mood on that day. Back then. In 2005. To be clear, today, in 2008, I feel mighty fine, if a little anemic! MEDIA WHORES AND THEIR CREATORS So, it appears Cindy Sheehan has gone and gotten herself arrested while her supporters - proving definitively that they are permanently stuck in 1968 - shouted, “the whole world is watching!” (well, Al Jazeera was, anyway - note they got Sheehan with the “forlorn” expression) Whoopee. The woman, who this weekend kvetched because CNN et al were spending all of their time covering Hurricane Rita, which was “just a little wind and rain,” instead of Herself climbing all over Jesse Jackson, made certain she’ll be covered on all the channels tonight - that she’ll get the Drudge coverage and the number one spot on Technorati. She sat down where she wasn’t supposed to and, after three warnings, was “arrested.” “Attention all you cameramen, I am about to be arrested, please focus!” I can’t think of anything that seems to destroy people’s mental health faster than a few weeks or months of uncritical, gushing media hype. Think about the people you see in the news, day after day, gathering unconditional praise and coverage from the press. They lose themselves, lose their minds, and they are rarely ever the same after the adulation stops. In fact, I can only think of one person who got caught up in the destructive swirl of relentless positive press reportage and managed to find his way back to sanity, and that would be Sen. Joe Lieberman, and perhaps - I am only saying PERHAPS - his faith has something to do with his re-bound. The rest of them, once courted, feted, promoted, celebrated, hyped and carried by the press have a very difficult time of it, post-praise. Sen. John Kerry, a truly terrible presidential candidate, cold, stiff and barely articulate had months and months of uncritical love. Months of the press never asking him a single difficult question, months of the press scurrying to fight his battles, discredit his critics and pat him on the back after soft-ball interviews. He had the press basically promising him a 10-15% advantage for their coverage - a promise which it does seem they delivered on. When he still lost, and lost soundly, and all of the microphones and cameras went away, he couldn’t seem to believe it. After a nearly silent 20-year career in the Senate during which he did little more than write bills recognizing special days for special people, Kerry was suddenly opining on everything, calling press conferences and issuing statements, and yet the press was not loving him as it had. They barely noticed him. He was back to being a “local paper” story instead of a national figure. He hasn’t been the same, since. Sen. John McCain discovered he could make the press “love” him by criticizing his party and not merely working with the opposition but shoving his metaphorical tongue down their metaphorical throats. He became the media darling of 1999 and 2000, with endless magazine covers, endless gushing interviews with Katie and Diane and Oprah, endless furrowed-brow talks with Ted Koppel. The “Maverick” became the only acceptable sort of GOP candidate and - for many in the press - a palatable alternative to Al Gore, who was becoming problematic, what with Buddhist nuns, controlling legal authorities, Clinton-fatigue and spots of embarrassing exaggerations regarding his personal life and his “inventiveness.” When the press reluctantly left McCain behind to cover the actual GOP candidate, McCain was smart enough to realize that all he ever had to do to call them back and bask in the warmth of their klieg lights was to step left-and-lively, and he has done it ever since. He cannot stop himself. Those lights, those microphones, those headlines and all that unequivocal approval - it’s heady stuff to a guy who crashed 3 planes. Al Gore - well, what can be said about poor Al Gore? Told by the press, over and over, that he was gypped, even after a consortium of papers did themselves concede that he lost in 2000, he seems like a gas leak in search of a pilot light. But he’ll always have Paul Krugman. I cannot even imagine what will happen to any Clinton for whom the uncritical praise ends. And now, we see Mother Sheehan - an utter media creation who burnished her genuine tragedy with an ability to cry-on-cue, but who has long-since overplayed the “grieving mother” hand and become all about preening and performing for the camera. Yesterday people losing lives and livelihoods to a storm were mere peons interfering with her scheduled adulation. Today she got herself arrested, smiling the whole while and still quite certain that the constitution which guarantees her the right to self-destruct in an endless loop on CNN, is a constitution that is not worth dying for. Can a posing session for Playboy be far behind? That’s where all the sad she-clowns go when they’re usefulness has ended, isn’t it? Once again, repeat after me - it is amazing how much destruction is wrought because of a need to feel loved. I didn’t get small! The protests got small! Btw…I’m in a bad mood today. Blogging will be cloudy, with a chance of snark. http://theanchoressonline.com/2008/04/30/the-sheehaning-of-jeremiah-wright/trackback/ 11 Responses to “The Sheehaning of Jeremiah Wright?”Leave a ReplyYou must be logged in to post a comment. |
Site SyndicationAdvertise on this blog ![]() ![]()
![]() ![]() ![]() ![]() BlogrollMeta Data
|
Bad Behavior has blocked 28847 access attempts in the last 7 days.
May 1st, 2008 at 6:25 am
Anchoress:
I agree with much of what you say, but saying McCain shoves his tongue down the throat of the media is a bit much. Maybe the press has not been as nasty to McCain because of his attitude toward them. He knows how to handle them. So did Reagan. And I also think his personal story appeals to the press. His years as a POW and his homecoming has something of a bigger than life quality that media people find appealing.
When Bush took his party on when it came to issues like immigration I don’t think he did it just to be contrary and I don’t think McCain did either. In fact it seems to me that President Bush has been every bit as willing to stand up to his own party as McCain has. And you always seemed to find that appealing in Bush, why not McCain?
May 1st, 2008 at 6:26 am
As for Reverend Wright, the man has spent most of his life running his mouth, now he just has a bigger audience. Same guy, same nonsense.
May 1st, 2008 at 7:49 am
Terrye, this thing was written in 2005. And in 2005, on that day - a day I wrote I was in a bad mood - I wrote that about John McCain.
I like (and respect) him better, now, but still not as much as either Bush or Reagan!
May 1st, 2008 at 7:55 am
[…] The Anchoress notices more-or-less the same thing… …the man keeps running his open sore of a mouth and the […]
May 1st, 2008 at 8:29 am
Very interesting post. I really think some serious “self-introspection” is in order here for Wright. To so many of us it is obvious the man is starving for something…love, acceptance, etc… He he is making a spectacle of himself in front of the whole world and it is really sad to watch. I feel sorry for him. It makes you wonder if he does not have anyone in his life that would be honest eough with him and point this out. I also find it disturbing that he is hiding behind a “ministers” cloak. There simply is no humility and love in what he is doing.
May 1st, 2008 at 9:46 am
Shehan posing where? Aaaaaaaagh! My eyes!
Water!
Soap!
Brillo!
May 1st, 2008 at 10:24 am
Web Reconnaissance for 05/01/2008
A short recon of what’s out there that might draw your attention, updated throughout the day…so check back often.
May 1st, 2008 at 11:13 am
To be clear, here — except in the last week, Jeremiah Wright has hardly placed himself “in front of the whole world.” It was not he who paraded himself in front of the media, so as to dominate political discussions ad nauseum.
Wright made nearly all of his comments in the relative privacy and obscurity of his congregation. It was folks in the media who have replayed a portion of his remarks over and over and over and over and over and over and over. It is like those times when someone says something “offensive” in passing to a small group, but it is the media which publicizes it and repeats it over and over — thereby engaging in the greater offense. And speaking of media whores, it was Sean Hannity who has been pushing Wright for nearly a year now. If the media had simply ignored Wright from the get go, if the media had simply ignored Hannity (which I am increasingly doing), then no one would have ever heard what he has said.
Instead, like a million other times this election season, we have folks who are going out of their way to find reasons to get offended. We have folks who hunt and search for some remarks to get outraged about.
I don’t know much of what this Wright fellow has said. I don’t much care. He’s not running for anything.
I do care, however, when folks take out-of-context snippets of what my own religious leaders have said, put their own spin on them, and use them as a springboard to advance their own political agendas. I do care when folks take a sentence or two from Pope Benedict and totally distort what he has said (Regensburg, anyone? or immigration and Lou Dobbs?). I do care when folks try to smear someone because of their affiliation with the Catholic Church (which is filled with women-hating pedophiles, don’t you know). And since I really do not like it when these things are done to my side, so I really cannot care for when they are done to the other side.
Besides, there are real issues out there, but once again, we are making electoral decisions on such idiotic things like flag-burning, and the pledge of allegiance.
May 1st, 2008 at 12:32 pm
To be clear, Bender, while you make a good point, (and yes, most of this can be laid at Hannity’s feet in one way or the other) Wright has lately “stepped forward and lively” with some enthusiasm, and I don’t think anyone is taking him “out of context” any longer…except, maybe, in a reverse-situation, the left-leaning media. And by now it really should be obvious that there are some for whom Wright’s bizarro rants (and Obama’s response to them) say everything they need to hear about Obama, and who will continue to hammer it rather than let Obama sink in the thousand other ways he (I think) eventually would anyway.
We live in what the ancient Chinese call “interesting times.” Between Rush Limbaugh’s “Operation Rescue” which I dislike very much although clearly, he has a fanbase loving the schtick, (which is confusing an already completely messed up primary season), and Hannity, Wright, and change-a-day Hillary who spins around like some cartoon character who - at each pause - becomes someone new, this is one hell of a fix..
May 1st, 2008 at 3:21 pm
Anchoress:
I have to admit, I like Bush better than Reagan or McCain. But I think I am in a minority there.
May 1st, 2008 at 6:39 pm
Terrye- i 2nd that emotion.