May 16, 2008

Linking around: Bush/Obama/Press & more

Quote of the Weekend:

Can Somebody Explain to Me how Obama sat in Wright’s church for 20 years and managed never to hear anything, but hears 20 seconds of a Bush speech that doesn’t mention him and perceives a shameful personal attack? - Andy McCarthy

Yesterday I wrote:

What is very interesting to me is how quickly the headlines and stories have moved away from Bush and any full-text, contextual display of the speech to making it all about Obama. Yes…it really is all about the O!

Completely escaping the attention of both the Dems and the press is the fact that Bush mentioned appeasement and they all jumped up and said, “hey, Obama resembles that remark.” Badly, badly played, Dems.

Today Matthew Sheppard expands on that; he makes the very good point that Bush’s historic 2400 word speech was edited by the incurious press to 83 word that the press, the Democrats and Barack Obama seemed all too eager to identify with Obama’s foreign policy ideas:

From a speech that lasted over 20 minutes — interrupted eight times by applause from Israeli Knesset members — America’s media exclusively reported 83 words they felt insulted the candidate for president they have been unashamedly supporting for over a year.

If I were a journalist, I’d be embarrassed. I’d also worry a little about backing a candidate with such a crystalline jaw that even when a jab is not directly meant for him, he still hits the mat. Obama’s tendency to carry and play the worlds tiniest violin - boohoo everybody is so mean to me and I’m so good - is getting old real fast. Did he not realize how much he sounds like whining Hillary?

Ed Morrissey notes that Obama (and the Dems) have very clumsily managed to own the appeasement label. Really not ready for prime-time:

Obama and his surrogates drew those connections themselves. Instead of acknowledging the historical truth of appeasement’s failures, they chose to argue with it. Obama could have taken the smart route and embraced it to explain how he understands the lessons of appeasement, which is why his talks with Iran would not result in it. Instead, he got volcanically defensive, which suggests that even Obama sees the parallels between his everything’s-on-the-table approach and the Chamberlain diplomacy which resulted in dismantling Czechoslovakia.

Ace notes just how far the press will go to cover and spin for Obama, even if they have to out-and-out lie to do it. Even Lou Dobbs seems a little embarrassed about it.

Probably if Obama does not want
to seem comfortable with terrorists or any associations with them, he should maybe start by taking the tiniest baby-step right-and-lively and stop trying to legitimize Hamas and Hezbollah, and maybe suggest that their wish to obliterate Israel is repellent to him, while he’s at it. But clearly he doesn’t think that’s necessary. And maybe he is right - after all, like John Kerry and Al Gore before him, he needn’t worry too much about anything he’s saying, since the fawning press will give him security-blanket coverage.

As I wrote a while back, “The press is lost….Within hours of any story the Bush-bash narrative, complete with emotional manipulation will kick in, and then they become useless. At worst, they are the willing, incurious, glassy-eyed ushers of an incipient tyranny.”

That was not a very nice thing to write, was it? It’s not nice to watch, either. But the press’ Obama fetish has even been noticed overseas. Vanderluen has a more vulgar take on it.

But at least we don’t have to worry about being arrested for editorial content. Yet.

Moving along, over at CQ Politics the veepstakes comes down to Huckabee vs Pawlenty & Palin vs Portman. Huckabee’s charm offensive never worked on Betsy, nor on me. If McCain puts him on the ticket, I’m going to have a very hard time.

Maybe a singing revolution is a good idea.

Quick thought: My spacenerd husband is watching In the Shadow of the Moon, about the Apollo space program. After watching a lift-off, with all the flame, smoke and debris we turned to each other in near-unison and said, “if America was trying to initiate such a program today, the environmentalists would not allow it.” Quite right. They would subdue the urge to greatness with grim and joyless pronouncements, and Washington would cave. Congress can’t even grow balls for oil - they’d never have supported a dangerous and expensive space program. When we got to the part where the astronauts read from Genesis as they circled the moon, I said, “they’d be severely taken to task for that, today, too - based on the separation of church and state…which isn’t actually in the constitution.” Turns out, an atheist in Houston did make a fuss about it on those grounds. The crabassing has been going on for decades, now, and it’s getting very tiring.

Quick, Interesting Hits:
Repellent Rudeness: Childish, too
Amusing: Don Surber with McCain on the Bus.
Cool Idea: Inside Catholic’s printable weekly digest
Irreverent: Veep Clinton and the missing O
Clever: Song Parody: You’re so Vain: Bush walked into the Knesset/Like he was elected president…
Provocative: Refusing background checks on principle?
Informative: Neoneocon on photoshopping
Short/Sweet: Peace begins in the womb
Demoralizing: “Tough Diplomacy” Skin Game
Thoughtful: Editing CS Lewis for the times and why that matters. A Review of Prince Caspian here
Inspiring: Rocco with a Righteous Gentile
Sad: A death in the family
Moving: “That I may never get in the way of Jesus Christ.”


Media Mythbusters Blog pinged back with Media Bias Roundup - 05/19/08
GayPatriot pinged back with Obama, Appeasement and Media Bias
House of Eratosthenes pinged back with House of Eratosthenes
Actually read the text of this speech? | The Anchoress pinged back with Actually read the text of this speech? | The Anchoress
Amused Cynic pinged back with Doin’ the WUStL hustle…giving Phyllis Schlafly the “Red Guard” treatment….
Brutally Honest tracked back with Speaking of hammers

Trackback URL for this post:
http://theanchoressonline.com/2008/05/16/linking-around-bushobamahamas-more/trackback/

11 Responses to “Linking around: Bush/Obama/Press & more”

  1. fporretto Says:

    With regard to the appeasement / “negotiation” matter, a statesman whose name has slipped my mind once said that if one side considers getting an agreement to be mandatory, above and apart from matters of substance, then there will be an agreement. Of course, if the other side knows this, it will contrive to get everything it wants and give nothing in return except…the agreement.

    This has been the shape of American diplomacy with rogue states and gangster-groups since the Nixon Administration. As it’s well supported by the inherent dynamics of a permanent diplomatic institution, it seems unlikely to change, at least in the short term, regardless of who attains the White House.

  2. Athos Says:

    Regarding scriptwriters rewriting C. S. Lewis: after The Lion, the Witch, and the Wardrobe, I was impressed by the lack of rewriting. Sadly, Prince Caspian suffers from Peter-Jackson-itis: scriptwriters deciding for reasons known only to themselves to embellish and distort the plot, not to mention change characterizations. King Peter becomes a whiney, indecisive, malcontent in the same way that Peter Jackson makes Aragorn (’Strider’) lack confidence and become an ubermensch hack-at-naught. Both are not only unjust to Lewis and Tolkien, but portray a substantially different message to viewers of the films.

    Neither Lewis nor Tolkien would have agreed to these injustices. I fear the Narnian franchise will continue moving in this direction of focus-group crowd-pleasing.

  3. Fr. Steve Leake Says:

    I couldn’t agree more about Obama. Sadly, he would be the most liberal and anti-life President in our history. I was so happy to see Hillary being challenged, but when the rubber hits the road she would be far better than him in the White House. Let’s pray that John McCain comes around to the traditional base of the party and takes it in November! God bless! Padre, Steve

  4. dmd25 Says:

    I caught a little bit of Rush yesterday and heard him talk about Obama. Remember Obama getting upset when Maureen Dowd mentioned his ears

    Things You Can’t Say About Obama

    Lots to read in today’s post! Thanks for keeping us informed!

    [edited to correct links - admin]

  5. Brutally Honest Says:

    Speaking of hammers

    The Anchoress brings us to the quote of the week… hell, maybe the quote of this political season:Can Somebody Explain to Me how Obama sat in Wright’s church for 20 years and managed never to hear anything, but hears 20

  6. Bender B. Rodriguez Says:

    Can Somebody Explain to Me how Obama sat in Wright’s church for 20 years and managed never to hear anything

    Yes, it is disgusting and outrageous and probably disqualifying of the presidency that a man should sit for 20 years, not only listening to repeated and constant anti-American hate of the most repugnant sort, but working with and making friends with one who should spew such bile.

    Oh, wait, that describes John McCain and his Democratic buddies, who have said things much, much, much worse against America and the American people than Wright could ever dream of, and who have been more actually destructive of this country, and have the actual potential to do more harm, than 100 Wrights ever could.

    One Wright pales in comparison to the many Shumers, Kerrys, Dodds, Harkins, Boxers, Bidens, Leahys, Feingolds, Kennedys, and Clintons that McCain has made pals with and endeavors to work with at every opportunity.

  7. Amused Cynic » Blog Archive » Doin’ the WUStL hustle…giving Phyllis Schlafly the “Red Guard” treatment…. Says:

    [...] it’s not really just their problem, it’s a larger problem in academia. Just repellent rudeness, as the Anchoress put it, that these “brats” (as Gateway Pundit correctly called them) [...]

  8. Actually read the text of this speech? | The Anchoress Says:

    [...] Linking around: Bush/Obama/Press & more [...]

  9. House of Eratosthenes Says:

    [...] continues the next day, with a money quote… If I were a journalist, I’d be embarrassed. I’d also worry a little [...]

  10. GayPatriot » Obama, Appeasement and Media Bias Says:

    [...] Anchoress had a great roundup about this brouhaha, building on a point she made in a previous post that “the headlines and stories have moved [...]

  11. Media Mythbusters Blog » Blog Archive » Media Bias Roundup - 05/19/08 Says:

    [...] The Anchoress: Linking around: Bush/Obama/Press & more. We love The Anchoress by the way - she is a gentle soul with a biting wit. Never boring and she [...]

Bad Behavior has blocked 18686 access attempts in the last 7 days.